Our website uses cookies to help provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and to distinguish you from other users.

Learn more about our cookies policy here.

Accept and continue >
Search

Divorce law blog

Myth of the common law marriage leaves cohabitees vulnerable, a new survey reveals

04/04/2017   By: Alison Bull


A recent YouGov survey commissioned by us here at Mills & Reeve highlights that many people who are unmarried but live with their partners do not fully understand their legal positions and have no idea what rights they would have if they were to separate in due course. 

Cohabiting couples are the fastest growing family type in the UK. ONS figures show that between 1996 and 2016, numbers more than doubled from 1.5 million to 3.3 million – accounting for 17.5 per cent of families in the UK. 

There is a widely held belief that people who live together have rights against each other under the myth of the “common law marriage”. People think that they are protected when they own property and there is an assumption that the law provides a "fair financial remedy" if a cohabiting relationship ends. However, there is no such thing as a common law spouse (you are either legally married to your partner or you are not) and the outcome for those who are not married can often feel very unfair indeed.

 Under the current law, it is possible that, at the end of a relationship, one partner who has contributed significantly more than the other in terms of a deposit to purchase the property, monthly mortgage repayments and bills, must hand over 50 per cent of the property to the other party. It is also possible that one partner, whose name is not on the legal title but who has made substantial contributions, both financial and non-financial, including staying at home to bring up the children, ends up with nothing.

More than 1,000 cohabiting people/ individuals across England were surveyed. The results revealed:

  • despite the law stating that people who live together do not have the same rights against each other as those who are married, more than a third (35 per cent) of those surveyed either believed they had the same rights or did not know;
  • typically, when two people purchase a property, the value in the property (the equity) will usually be owned as "joint tenants". However, 35 per cent of those questioned did not know that where property is owned as joint tenants, the starting point is 50:50 regardless of how much each contributed to the purchase price. Almost 60 per cent were unaware that a joint tenant’s share will automatically pass to the surviving cohabitee regardless of their will;
  • the intestacy rules do not make any provision for unmarried couples, so a cohabitee would not inherit their partner’s estate unless it is left to them in a will. However, despite this, 44 per cent of those questioned did not have a will so their partner would not inherit as they may assume in the event of their death;
  • 73 per cent of those questioned were unaware of what types of financial support they would be entitled to from their partner for the benefit of their children.

The law surrounding cohabitation can result in terribly unfair results and cases are often complex, lengthy and expensive. Yet there are more and more people living together and choosing not to get married or enter into civil partnerships. Society is changing and the legal system needs to catch up.

Find out more about our survey and the rights of cohabiting couples by viewing our Myth of the Common Law Marriage web page and look out for more blogs this week on steps unmarried couples can take to protect their financial position and avoid costly disputes if their relationship breaks down. 


Add Comment

(required)
(required)
CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above in the box below
  Post Comment
  Notify me of follow up comments via e-mail